Review likeness, hands, hair, accessories, text, and reflections against the source. Use a practical checklist without pretending visual inspection proves authenticity.
Illustrative stock photograph; not a Meluvya result or a test of the technique. Photo by Ebahir / Pexels.
The quick answer
Compare the generated portrait with its source, first at normal size and then in important details. Check recognizable features, hands, accessories, text, and the relationship between reflections and objects. Decide whether the changes fit your intended use. A convincing-looking image is not proof that every detail is accurate.
Start with what the picture is meant to represent
A playful restyled portrait and a factual professional photograph have different expectations. Decide what must remain accurate before judging how attractive the output looks. If it represents another person, include that person in the selection.
Adobe lists text and anatomy among known limitations of its Firefly system. That is evidence that plausible generation can contain mistakes, not a specification of how Meluvya behaves. Review the actual output rather than assuming every generator has the same strengths.
Inspect the details that carry meaning
Area
What to compare
Face and hair
Recognizable features, hairline, and changes the person did not intend.
Hands and contact points
Finger relationships and how hands meet clothing, objects, or another person.
Accessories
Glasses, earrings, straps, and repeated elements that should connect coherently.
Text and symbols
Readable words, logos, and signs that may have changed.
Reflections and background
Whether visible relationships make sense within the image.
Use a keep, revise, or reject decision
Review the whole image. Check whether the pose, expression, and scene fit the purpose. Do not start by hunting for tiny flaws while ignoring a major change in likeness.
Compare meaningful regions. Place the source beside the output and inspect the details that matter to this portrait. Separate intentional restyling from accidental alteration.
Choose the smallest next action. A crop may remove irrelevant background text, but it cannot make a changed face accurate. Consider a different output or a clearer source.
Check the final export. Inspect the version you will actually share, including its crop and caption. Describe the image appropriately for its use.
A checklist is not an AI detector
Real photographs can also contain blur, unusual reflections, and perspective effects. Conversely, a generated image can look coherent. These checks assess suitability and consistency; they do not prove the image's origin.
For a portrait used to document something that happened, a generated scene is not a substitute for the original evidence. Keep the source and avoid presenting invented surroundings or details as a recorded event.
Common questions
Does an odd hand prove a photo is AI-generated?
No. A visual anomaly alone does not establish origin. Use the checklist to review the picture, not to make unsupported accusations.
Should I reject every tiny imperfection?
Prioritize details that affect meaning, likeness, or the intended display. A changed facial feature matters more than an irrelevant distant texture.
Can a clearer source help?
It can make comparison easier and reduce ambiguity in the input, but it does not guarantee a particular generated result.